Solutions / Social content

Social content automation

One idea from your content plan becomes a post pack for every platform you publish on — each in that platform’s format and tone — queued for a person to approve before anything goes live.

Marketing Content Automation
20 minutes
for a five-platform pack, not two hours
Every post
approved by a person before publishing
One voice
held by a written style guide
Who it is for

Heads of marketing and content teams publishing on three or more platforms a week without three or more content people.

Short answer

Your content plan goes in as ideas; what comes out is a pack per idea — the LinkedIn version, the Instagram caption, the Telegram post, the X thread — each written to that platform’s length, format and register, with hashtags and a visual brief attached. Nothing publishes itself: the pack lands in a review queue where your editor edits, approves or kills it, and the approved posts go into the scheduler.

The problem

The same idea gets rewritten five times by hand, and by the fifth platform the tone has drifted.

01

Adaptation eats the week

Writing the idea takes twenty minutes. Reshaping it for five platforms takes two hours, every time, and it is the least interesting work in the team.

02

The voice drifts between platforms

LinkedIn ends up corporate, Instagram ends up chatty, and neither sounds like the brand. With three people writing, the drift compounds until nobody can define the voice at all.

03

The plan slips because publishing is manual

A post ready on Tuesday goes out Friday because somebody had to log into four platforms. The calendar becomes a wish list, and consistency — the one thing social rewards — is the first casualty.

How it works

From trigger to result, step by step.

01

Write the style guide down

We turn your voice into rules a model can follow: vocabulary, sentence length, what you never claim, how you handle numbers and links, examples of posts that are right and posts that are wrong. Without this step the output is fluent and generic.

02

Take the plan as input

Ideas come from wherever they already live — Notion, Airtable, a spreadsheet — with the angle, the audience and the goal for each. The system reads the plan, not your mind.

03

Generate the pack per platform

Each platform gets its own draft: length, opening line, formatting, hashtag conventions and call to action, plus a short visual brief for the designer. Threads are threads; captions are captions.

04

Route to review

Everything stops in a queue. Your editor edits inline, approves or rejects with a reason — and the rejections are what we feed back into the rules, so the drafts get closer to publishable each month.

05

Schedule and report

Approved posts go into Buffer, Later or the platform APIs at the planned times. Engagement comes back per post and per angle, so the plan is built on what performed rather than on what felt right.

Before / after

What changes on the ground.

Today, by hand
×Every idea is rewritten five times by hand
×Voice drifts platform to platform
×Posts slip days because publishing is manual
×Nobody knows which angle performed
With the automation running
A five-platform pack in about twenty minutes
One written style guide, applied consistently
Approved posts scheduled automatically
Engagement reported per post and per angle
What you get

Delivered, not demoed.

A written brand voice guide, derived from your best existing posts
Per-platform generation with format, length and hashtag rules
A review queue with approve, edit and reject-with-reason
Scheduling into your existing tool or straight to the platform APIs
A monthly performance digest by angle and format
Built with

We build in your stack rather than moving you onto ours. The list below is what this solution most often connects to — other systems are a scoping question, not a blocker.

Python OpenAI Anthropic Notion Airtable Buffer Later Slack Meta Graph API LinkedIn API
Time to production3–4 weeks
Build priceFixed quote
First stepFree mini-audit
Honest limits

When this is not the right solution.

·If you publish a couple of times a month, the setup costs more attention than it saves. Come back when the calendar is weekly and it hurts.
·If nobody has time to review, do not build this. Unreviewed generated posts are how a brand voice dies quietly, and we would rather not be part of that.
·It does not decide what to say. Strategy, positioning and the ideas themselves stay with your team — this makes execution cheap, not thinking optional.

Questions we get about this one

They will if the style guide is thin, which is why the first week of the project is spent building it from posts you already like. Your editor still reviews everything, and every edit tightens the rules.

Bring us the process that hurts.

The mini-audit is free: we take your version of this process apart and tell you plainly whether automating it pays. If it does, you get a scope and a fixed price.