Solutions / SEO content

SEO content brief & draft generator

Briefs built from what actually ranks for a query, then drafts written to that brief in your voice — with the facts and internal links your editor would have had to look up.

Marketing Content LLM
Brief in minutes
instead of half a day of research
Draft to the brief
not a generic essay
Sources attached
so the editor can check
Who it is for

Marketing teams publishing regularly enough that research time, not writing time, is the bottleneck.

Short answer

For a target query, the system reads what currently ranks, extracts the structure and questions those pages answer, and produces a brief: intent, sections, entities to cover, questions to answer, internal links, word-count range. The draft is then written to that brief in your voice, with sources attached to factual claims — which turns a writer’s day of research into an editor’s hour of judgement.

The problem

Half a day disappears into research before a single sentence of the article gets written.

01

Research is the real cost

Reading the top ten results, extracting the structure, finding the questions and collecting the facts takes longer than the writing. It is also the part that gets skipped under deadline.

02

Generic AI drafts cost more to fix than to write

A draft with no brief behind it produces smooth paragraphs that say nothing, miss the intent and cite nothing. Editing that is slower than starting from a blank page.

03

Internal linking never happens

Nobody remembers the two hundred posts already published, so new articles link to nothing and the older ones stay orphaned.

How it works

From trigger to result, step by step.

01

Read the SERP properly

What ranks, what type of page it is, what sections recur, which questions get answered, what entities appear everywhere. Intent is inferred from the results, not assumed from the keyword.

02

Build a brief an editor would sign off

Intent, angle, section outline, entities and questions to cover, suggested internal links, length range, and what to avoid. This is the artefact that decides whether the draft is any good.

03

Draft in your voice, grounded

Your style guide and published examples set the voice; factual claims carry sources; your product is mentioned where it genuinely fits and not in every third paragraph.

04

Link into your existing library

The draft proposes internal links from your actual sitemap, in both directions, so new pieces connect to the archive and the archive stops being orphaned.

05

Hand to the editor, and measure

Drafts land in your CMS as unpublished, with the brief attached. Editing time per piece and how the published pieces rank are tracked, so the value is a number rather than an impression.

Before / after

What changes on the ground.

Today, by hand
×Half a day of research per article
×AI drafts that need rewriting from scratch
×Internal links added by memory, or not at all
×No measurement of what the process saves
With the automation running
A brief built from the live SERP in minutes
Drafts written to the brief in your voice
Internal links proposed from your real sitemap
Editing time and rankings tracked per piece
What you get

Delivered, not demoed.

A brief generator that reads the current SERP for your queries
A voice specification derived from your published content
Grounded drafts with sources attached to factual claims
Internal-link proposals from your own sitemap
CMS delivery as drafts, plus editing-time and ranking reporting
Built with

We build in your stack rather than moving you onto ours. The list below is what this solution most often connects to — other systems are a scoping question, not a blocker.

Claude OpenAI Python Serper LangChain WordPress Webflow n8n
Time to production4–6 weeks
Build priceFixed quote
First stepFree mini-audit
Honest limits

When this is not the right solution.

·If you publish twice a year, the setup outweighs the saving. Hire a good freelance writer instead — we will say so.
·In fields where accuracy is the whole product — medical, legal, financial advice — the draft can only be a starting point for a qualified author, never a substitute.
·If nobody edits, do not publish generated drafts. Unedited output is how sites lose the rankings they already had.

Questions we get about this one

Google’s guidance targets unhelpful content, whatever produced it. Briefs grounded in real search results, drafts with sources, and human editing before publishing is a process that performs, and that is the process we build.

Bring us the process that hurts.

The mini-audit is free: we take your version of this process apart and tell you plainly whether automating it pays. If it does, you get a scope and a fixed price.