For each contact the agent reads the company site, the role and recent public signals, picks one specific hook and writes a one-to-one email around it. That takes 10–20 seconds per contact instead of the 5–10 minutes a rep spends doing it properly — and the hook is shown with its source so a human can check it before sending.
A rep who researches properly writes 15 emails a day. A rep who hits quota on volume sends 150 that all start the same way. The first approach works and does not scale; the second scales and does not work.
«Hi {first_name}, I saw {company} is in {industry}» reads as automated to every recipient, because it is. It buys the volume of a template and the reply rate of one too.
Even when someone does the research, it lives in a browser tab and a half-written draft. Nothing is recorded, so the next rep to touch that account starts from zero.
Contacts come from the CRM, a CSV or your enrichment tool. Missing company, role or domain fields are filled in first, so the writing step is not guessing from a name and an email.
The company site, careers page, recent news, the person's public role and posts. The agent is looking for one concrete, checkable fact that gives the email a reason to exist.
If nothing specific is found, the agent says so rather than inventing a compliment. That contact goes back to the list as “no hook found”, which is a far better outcome than a plausible fabrication reaching a prospect.
The email follows your structure, your length, your offer and your tone, tuned on the emails your team already sends and wins with. The hook is embedded, not bolted onto the first line.
Drafts land in a review queue with the hook and its source link. Approved emails go out through your existing sequencer or mailbox, so deliverability, unsubscribes and the sending domain stay exactly as they are.
We build in your stack rather than moving you onto ours. The list below is what this solution most often connects to — other systems are a scoping question, not a blocker.
Every hook is attached to the source it came from, and a contact where nothing specific was found is returned as “no hook” rather than filled in with something plausible. That rule is the whole reason the output is safe to send; a system that always produces a compliment will eventually produce a false one.
We use cookies for analytics — to see which pages bring enquiries. Nothing else, and nothing before you agree. Cookie Policy