The close produces a number that differs from plan, and then someone spends days working out why. The answer arrives after the decisions it should have informed.
A duplicated subscription, a drifting rate, a supplier quietly repricing — none of it moves the total enough to notice until it has run for a year.
Everyone agrees the spend could be tightened. Nobody has the two weeks it takes to prove where.
Ledger, bank feeds, subscriptions, payroll and supplier data are consolidated on a schedule, across entities and currencies.
Actuals are compared against plan and against the account’s own history. The agent isolates the transactions driving each variance rather than reporting the variance alone.
Each finding is written as a sentence a non-finance manager can act on, with the underlying transactions attached.
Duplicates, off-pattern payments, price drift and dormant subscriptions are surfaced with the evidence and a confidence level — for review, never for automatic action.
Optimisations are proposed with an estimated annual value, and the ones you accept are tracked so the saving is verified rather than assumed.
We build in your stack rather than moving you onto ours. The list below is what this solution most often connects to — other systems are a scoping question, not a blocker.
No, and it should not. It reads financial data and writes findings. Payments, ledger changes and contract decisions stay entirely with your finance team.