Solutions / Intake assistant

Patient & customer intake assistant

Intake forms and inbound requests are read, checked for what is missing, and written into your system with a person verifying anything that matters.

Support RAG / knowledge Healthcare · E-commerce
3.5×
faster intake
100%
of intake steps logged
0
clinical decisions made by the system
Who it is for

Clinics and service teams with high inbound volume where intake is a form, a phone call and a person retyping both.

The problem

Intake is the slowest, most repetitive step — and the one where mistakes cost most.

01

The same details, entered twice

A patient or customer fills a form, then a coordinator retypes it into the system of record. The second pass adds delay and a new chance to get it wrong.

02

Incomplete intake is discovered late

A missing referral, an unreadable insurance card or an unanswered question surfaces on the day, not at submission, and someone loses a slot.

03

No trail of who checked what

When an intake goes wrong, reconstructing what happened means asking people what they remember.

How it works

From trigger to result, step by step.

01

Receive the intake

Web forms, email, uploaded documents and scanned referrals arrive in one queue rather than three.

02

Read and structure

Fields are extracted from the form and its attachments — identifiers, referrals, coverage details, request type — into your schema.

03

Check completeness and consistency

Missing mandatory fields, unreadable documents and contradictions between form and attachment are detected at submission, while the person is still reachable.

04

Ask for what is missing

A short, specific request goes back automatically — the one document you need, not a generic resubmission notice.

05

Hand to a person, then write

A coordinator verifies the structured record and confirms. Only then is it written to your system, with every step logged.

Before / after

What changes on the ground.

Today, by hand
×Details retyped from form to system
×Gaps discovered on the day of the appointment
×Coordinators chase by phone from memory
×No audit trail of intake decisions
With the automation running
Structured record prepared automatically
Gaps caught at submission
Specific, automatic requests for what is missing
A complete, timestamped audit trail
What you get

Delivered, not demoed.

An intake pipeline across your forms, email and document channels
Validation rules for completeness, consistency and document readability
A verification step for a human before anything is committed
A full audit trail of what was extracted, checked and confirmed
Documentation and handover
Built with

We build in your stack rather than moving you onto ours. The list below is what this solution most often connects to — other systems are a scoping question, not a blocker.

OpenAI Anthropic AWS Textract Twilio Gmail API Microsoft 365 Postgres FHIR / HL7 n8n Slack
Time to production4–8 weeks
Build priceFixed quote
First stepFree mini-audit
Honest limits

When this is not the right solution.

·In healthcare this is back-office only. It structures and routes intake; it does not triage clinically, suggest a diagnosis, or prioritise by medical urgency. Those decisions stay with clinicians and we will not build otherwise.
·If your intake volume is low, a well-designed form validated at the browser gets you most of the benefit.
·Regulated environments need the compliance groundwork — lawful basis, retention, processor agreements, and in the US a BAA — in place before the build, not alongside it.

Questions we get about this one

No. The system reads, structures, checks completeness and routes. It does not triage by medical urgency, suggest a diagnosis or rank patients clinically. That boundary is deliberate and we hold it even when asked to cross it.

Bring us the process that hurts.

The mini-audit is free: we take your version of this process apart and tell you plainly whether automating it pays. If it does, you get a scope and a fixed price.